The question is, would it make a difference if one was passive in the practice of sodomy?
On a separate note, I realise that it is not usually the role of a Lib Dem to defend Neo-Cons, but I reckon that the author has absolutely no understanding of neo-conservatism. It's just a word he associates with Arab-bashing and homophobia.
If Paul Wolfowitz can date an Arab, I think that neoconservatism is probably a little more sophisticated than our Lincolnshire red-neck is capable of comprehending.
5 comments:
I've flagged it as containing objectionable material, and I suggest others do likewise.
One day they may grow up and shed their anonymity.
"you will find that he is active in the practice of sodomy"
Well, hellllloooooo ;-)
Rob,
I copied exactly the same line!
The question is, would it make a difference if one was passive in the practice of sodomy?
On a separate note, I realise that it is not usually the role of a Lib Dem to defend Neo-Cons, but I reckon that the author has absolutely no understanding of neo-conservatism. It's just a word he associates with Arab-bashing and homophobia.
If Paul Wolfowitz can date an Arab, I think that neoconservatism is probably a little more sophisticated than our Lincolnshire red-neck is capable of comprehending.
So how many people have to click the 'objectionable' flag before someone from Google actually looks at it?
Post a Comment